Relationships
Ember Data includes several built-in relationship types to help you define how your models relate to each other.
One-to-One
To declare a one-to-one relationship between two models, use
DS.belongsTo
:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
profile: DS.belongsTo('profile')
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
user: DS.belongsTo('user')
});
One-to-Many
To declare a one-to-many relationship between two models, use
DS.belongsTo
in combination with DS.hasMany
, like this:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
comments: DS.hasMany('comment')
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
blogPost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post')
});
Many-to-Many
To declare a many-to-many relationship between two models, use
DS.hasMany
:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
tags: DS.hasMany('tag')
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
blogPosts: DS.hasMany('blog-post')
});
Explicit Inverses
Ember Data will do its best to discover which relationships map to one
another. In the one-to-many code above, for example, Ember Data can figure out that
changing the comments
relationship should update the blogPost
relationship on the inverse because blogPost
is the only relationship to
that model.
However, sometimes you may have multiple belongsTo
/hasMany
s for
the same type. You can specify which property on the related model is
the inverse using DS.belongsTo
or DS.hasMany
's inverse
option. Relationships without an inverse can be indicated as such by
including { inverse: null }
.
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
onePost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post', { inverse: null }),
twoPost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post'),
redPost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post'),
bluePost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post')
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
comments: DS.hasMany('comment', {
inverse: 'redPost'
})
});
Reflexive Relations
When you want to define a reflexive relation (a model that has a relationship to
itself), you must explicitly define the inverse relationship. If there
is no inverse relationship then you can set the inverse to null
.
Here's an example of a one-to-many reflexive relationship:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
children: DS.hasMany('folder', { inverse: 'parent' }),
parent: DS.belongsTo('folder', { inverse: 'children' })
});
Here's an example of a one-to-one reflexive relationship:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
bestFriend: DS.belongsTo('user', { inverse: 'bestFriend' }),
});
You can also define a reflexive relationship that doesn't have an inverse:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
parent: DS.belongsTo('folder', { inverse: null })
});
Polymorphism
Polymorphism is a powerful concept which allows a developer to abstract common functionality into a base class. Consider the following example: a user with multiple payment methods. They could have a linked PayPal account, and a couple credit cards on file.
Note that, for polymorphism to work, Ember Data expects a
"type" declaration polymorphic type via the reserved type
property on the model. Confused? See the API response below.
First, let's look at the model definitions:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
paymentMethods: DS.hasMany('payment-method', { polymorphic: true })
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
user: DS.belongsTo('user', { inverse: 'paymentMethods' }),
});
import { computed } from '@ember/object';
import PaymentMethod from './payment-method';
export default PaymentMethod.extend({
last4: DS.attr(),
obfuscatedIdentifier: computed('last4', function () {
return `**** **** **** ${this.last4}`;
})
});
import { computed } from '@ember/object';
import DS from 'ember-data';
import PaymentMethod from './payment-method'
export default PaymentMethod.extend({
linkedEmail: DS.attr(),
obfuscatedIdentifier: computed('linkedEmail', function () {
let last5 = this.linkedEmail.split('').reverse().slice(0, 5).reverse().join('');
return `••••${last5}`;
})
});
And our API might setup these relationships like so:
{
"data": {
"id": "8675309",
"type": "user",
"attributes": {
"name": "Anfanie Farmeo"
},
"relationships": {
"payment-methods": {
"data": [{
"id": "1",
"type": "payment-method-paypal"
}, {
"id": "2",
"type": "payment-method-cc"
}, {
"id": "3",
"type": "payment-method-apple-pay"
}]
}
}
},
"included": [{
"id": "1",
"type": "payment-method-paypal",
"attributes": {
"linked-email": "ryan@gosling.io"
}
}, {
"id": "2",
"type": "payment-method-cc",
"attributes": {
"last4": "1335"
}
}, {
"id": "3",
"type": "payment-method-apple-pay",
"attributes": {
"last4": "5513"
}
}]
}
Readonly Nested Data
Some models may have properties that are deeply nested objects of
readonly data. The naïve solution would be to define models for each
nested object and use hasMany
and belongsTo
to recreate the nested
relationship. However, since readonly data will never need to be
updated and saved this often results in the creation of a great deal
of code for very little benefit. An alternate approach is to define
these relationships using an attribute with no transform
(DS.attr()
). This makes it easy to access readonly values in
computed properties and templates without the overhead of defining
extraneous models.
Creating Records
Let's assume that we have a blog-post
and a comment
model. A single blog post can have several comments linked to it. The correct relationship is shown below:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
comments: DS.hasMany('comment')
});
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
blogPost: DS.belongsTo('blog-post')
});
Now, suppose we want to add comments to an existing blogPost. We can do this in two ways, but for both of them, we first need to look up a blog post that is already loaded in the store, using its id:
let myBlogPost = this.store.peekRecord('blog-post', 1);
Now we can either set the belongsTo
relationship in our new comment, or, update the blogPost's hasMany
relationship. As you might observe, we don't need to set both hasMany
and belongsTo
for a record. Ember Data will do that for us.
First, let's look at setting the belongsTo
relationship in our new comment:
let comment = this.store.createRecord('comment', {
blogPost: myBlogPost
});
comment.save();
In the above snippet, we have referenced myBlogPost
while creating the record. This will let Ember know that the newly created comment belongs to myBlogPost
.
This will create a new comment
record and save it to the server. Ember Data will also update myBlogPost
to include our newly created comment in its comments
relationship.
The second way of doing the same thing is to link the two records together by updating the blogPost's hasMany
relationship as shown below:
let comment = this.store.createRecord('comment', {
});
myBlogPost.get('comments').pushObject(comment);
comment.save().then(function () {
myBlogPost.save();
});
In this above case, the new comment's belongsTo
relationship will be automatically set to the parent blogPost.
Although createRecord
is fairly straightforward, the only thing to watch out for
is that you cannot assign a promise as a relationship, currently.
For example, if you want to set the author
property of a blogPost, this would not work
if the user
with id isn't already loaded into the store:
this.store.createRecord('blog-post', {
title: 'Rails is Omakase',
body: 'Lorem ipsum',
author: this.store.findRecord('user', 1)
});
However, you can easily set the relationship after the promise has fulfilled:
let blogPost = this.store.createRecord('blog-post', {
title: 'Rails is Omakase',
body: 'Lorem ipsum'
});
this.store.findRecord('user', 1).then(function(user) {
blogPost.set('author', user);
});
Retrieving Related Records
When you request data from the server for a model that has relationships with one or more others,
you may want to retrieve records corresponding to those related models at the same time.
For example, when retrieving a blog post, you may need to access the comments associated
with the post as well.
The JSON:API specification allows
servers to accept a query parameter with the key include
as a request to
include those related records in the response returned to the client.
The value of the parameter should be a comma-separated list of names of the
relationships required.
If you are using an adapter that supports JSON:API, such as Ember's default JSONAPIAdapter
,
you can easily add the include
parameter to the server requests created by
the findRecord()
, findAll()
,
query()
and queryRecord()
methods.
findRecord()
and findAll()
each take an options
argument in which you can
specify the include
parameter.
For example, given a post
model that has a hasMany
relationship with a comment
model,
when retrieving a specific post we can have the server also return that post's comments
as follows:
import Route from '@ember/routing/route';
export default Route.extend({
model(params) {
return this.store.findRecord('post', params.post_id, {include: 'comments'});
}
});
The post's comments would then be available in your template as model.comments
.
Nested relationships can be specified in the include
parameter as a dot-separated sequence of relationship names.
So to request both the post's comments and the authors of those comments the request
would look like this:
import Route from '@ember/routing/route';
export default Route.extend({
model(params) {
return this.store.findRecord('post', params.post_id, {include: 'comments,comments.author'});
}
});
The query()
and queryRecord()
methods each take a query
argument that is
serialized directly into the URL query string and the include
parameter may
form part of that argument.
For example:
import Route from '@ember/routing/route';
export default Route.extend({
model() {
// GET to /artists?filter[name]=Adele&include=albums
this.store.query('artist', {
filter: {name: 'Adele'},
include: 'albums'
}).then(function(artists) {
return artists.get('firstObject');
});
}
});
Updating Existing Records
Sometimes we want to set relationships on already existing records. We can simply set a belongsTo
relationship:
let blogPost = this.store.peekRecord('blog-post', 1);
let comment = this.store.peekRecord('comment', 1);
comment.set('blogPost', blogPost);
comment.save();
Alternatively, we could update the hasMany
relationship by pushing a record into the relationship:
let blogPost = this.store.peekRecord('blog-post', 1);
let comment = this.store.peekRecord('comment', 1);
blogPost.get('comments').pushObject(comment);
blogPost.save();
Removing Relationships
To remove a belongsTo
relationship, we can set it to null
, which will also remove it from the hasMany
side:
let comment = this.store.peekRecord('comment', 1);
comment.set('blogPost', null);
comment.save();
It is also possible to remove a record from a hasMany
relationship:
let blogPost = this.store.peekRecord('blog-post', 1);
let comment = this.store.peekRecord('comment', 1);
blogPost.get('comments').removeObject(comment);
blogPost.save();
As in the earlier examples, the comment's belongsTo
relationship will also be cleared by Ember Data.
Relationships as Promises
While working with relationships it is important to remember that they return promises.
For example, if we were to work on a blogPost's asynchronous comments, we would have to wait until the promise has fulfilled:
let blogPost = this.store.peekRecord('blog-post', 1);
blogPost.get('comments').then((comments) => {
// now we can work with the comments
});
The same applies to belongsTo
relationships:
let comment = this.store.peekRecord('comment', 1);
comment.get('blogPost').then((blogPost) => {
// the blogPost is available here
});
Handlebars templates will automatically be updated to reflect a resolved promise. We can display a list of comments in a blogPost like so:
<ul>
{{#each this.blogPost.comments as |comment|}}
<li>{{comment.id}}</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
Ember Data will query the server for the appropriate records and re-render the template once the data is received.